<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffalo 802.11 AC Router at CES 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razetheworld.com/videos/buffalo-802-11-ac-router-at-ces-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razetheworld.com/videos/buffalo-802-11-ac-router-at-ces-2012/</link>
	<description>Set The World On Fire!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vortex</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/videos/buffalo-802-11-ac-router-at-ces-2012/#comment-658987</link>
		<dc:creator>Vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6827#comment-658987</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;ztrain &lt;a href=&quot;http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/buffalo-80211-ac-router-at-ces-2012#post-345447&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
yes... but they are getting that throughput because they basically have the antennas connected together....&lt;br /&gt;
its not rly wireless, its more like a digital to analog then back to digital conversion....
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yeah...and even if it were that fast, which remains to be seen, the ISP&#039;s in the US would only be using a minuscule fraction of that bandwidth. I really wish ISP&#039;s would get their shit together already.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>ztrain <a href="http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/buffalo-80211-ac-router-at-ces-2012#post-345447">said</a>:</cite><br />
yes&#8230; but they are getting that throughput because they basically have the antennas connected together&#8230;.<br />
its not rly wireless, its more like a digital to analog then back to digital conversion&#8230;.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah&#8230;and even if it were that fast, which remains to be seen, the ISP&#8217;s in the US would only be using a minuscule fraction of that bandwidth. I really wish ISP&#8217;s would get their shit together already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ztrain</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/videos/buffalo-802-11-ac-router-at-ces-2012/#comment-658986</link>
		<dc:creator>ztrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6827#comment-658986</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;yes... but they are getting that throughput because they basically have the antennas connected together....&lt;br /&gt;
its not rly wireless, its more like a digital to analog then back to digital conversion....
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes&#8230; but they are getting that throughput because they basically have the antennas connected together&#8230;.<br />
its not rly wireless, its more like a digital to analog then back to digital conversion&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  razetheworld.com/videos/buffalo-802-11-ac-router-at-ces-2012/feed/ ) in 0.56105 seconds, on May 22nd, 2012 at 4:57 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 22nd, 2012 at 5:57 am UTC -->
