<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PowerColor Radeon HD 6870 x2 GPU Review and Benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/</link>
	<description>Set The World On Fire!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: RuffeDK</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658197</link>
		<dc:creator>RuffeDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658197</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Boov &lt;a href=&quot;http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339778&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This would probably beat it in everything.&lt;br /&gt;
Because I know my two 6850s beat two 460s in a lot of games, so two 6870s would be significantly better.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is still $150 difference. And 460 2Win overclocks pretty well :P
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>Boov <a href="http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339778">said</a>:</cite><br />
This would probably beat it in everything.<br />
Because I know my two 6850s beat two 460s in a lot of games, so two 6870s would be significantly better.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There is still $150 difference. And 460 2Win overclocks pretty well <img src='http://razetheworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boov</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658196</link>
		<dc:creator>Boov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658196</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;RuffeDK &lt;a href=&quot;http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339776&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I&#8217;d like to see this vs. EVGA GTX 460 2Win
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would probably beat it in everything.&lt;br /&gt;
Because I know my two 6850s beat two 460s in a lot of games, so two 6870s would be significantly better.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>RuffeDK <a href="http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339776">said</a>:</cite><br />
I&#8217;d like to see this vs. EVGA GTX 460 2Win
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This would probably beat it in everything.<br />
Because I know my two 6850s beat two 460s in a lot of games, so two 6870s would be significantly better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RuffeDK</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658195</link>
		<dc:creator>RuffeDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see this vs. EVGA GTX 460 2Win</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see this vs. EVGA GTX 460 2Win</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaBuster.exe</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658194</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaBuster.exe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658194</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;cite&gt;ztrain &lt;a href=&quot;http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339770&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/cite&gt;
there is 1gb per gpu... each 1gb is at double data rate... so in all it should be 4200mhz
i believe that is where the confusion is coming in at least....
also, thats damn cool for a x2 card..... i have 2 4890&#039;s and at max load with 100% fan, one is hitting 86c and the other gets up to 79-80
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
DDR5 quad pumps for effective, not double
or thats what I&#039;ve been told, I know on newegg when they post the effective for most GDDR5 cards its in the 4000s
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>ztrain <a href="http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339770" rel="nofollow">said</a>:</cite><br />
there is 1gb per gpu&#8230; each 1gb is at double data rate&#8230; so in all it should be 4200mhz<br />
i believe that is where the confusion is coming in at least&#8230;.<br />
also, thats damn cool for a x2 card&#8230;.. i have 2 4890&#8242;s and at max load with 100% fan, one is hitting 86c and the other gets up to 79-80
</p></blockquote>
<p>DDR5 quad pumps for effective, not double<br />
or thats what I&#8217;ve been told, I know on newegg when they post the effective for most GDDR5 cards its in the 4000s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ztrain</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658193</link>
		<dc:creator>ztrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658193</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;cite&gt;GigaBuster.exe &lt;a href=&quot;http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339756&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/cite&gt;
don&#039;t you mean quad data rate for effective?  It should be 4200MHz for memory
great video though
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
there is 1gb per gpu... each 1gb is at double data rate... so in all it should be 4200mhz
i believe that is where the confusion is coming in at least....
also, thats damn cool for a x2 card..... i have 2 4890&#039;s and at max load with 100% fan, one is hitting 86c and the other gets up to 79-80
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><cite>GigaBuster.exe <a href="http://razetheworld.com/forum/topic/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark#post-339756" rel="nofollow">said</a>:</cite><br />
don&#8217;t you mean quad data rate for effective?  It should be 4200MHz for memory<br />
great video though
</p></blockquote>
<p>there is 1gb per gpu&#8230; each 1gb is at double data rate&#8230; so in all it should be 4200mhz<br />
i believe that is where the confusion is coming in at least&#8230;.<br />
also, thats damn cool for a x2 card&#8230;.. i have 2 4890&#8242;s and at max load with 100% fan, one is hitting 86c and the other gets up to 79-80</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vortex</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658192</link>
		<dc:creator>Vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;bump
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bump</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skullabyss</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658188</link>
		<dc:creator>skullabyss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658188</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome! and logan, I already beat you to posting this
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! and logan, I already beat you to posting this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaBuster.exe</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/#comment-658187</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaBuster.exe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=6169#comment-658187</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t you mean quad data rate for effective?  It should be 4200MHz for memory
great video though
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t you mean quad data rate for effective?  It should be 4200MHz for memory<br />
great video though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  razetheworld.com/hardware/graphics/powercolor-radeon-hd-6870-x2-gpu-review-and-benchmark/feed/ ) in 0.50643 seconds, on May 19th, 2012 at 2:25 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2012 at 3:25 am UTC -->
