<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asus current motherboard supported the Bulldozer with BIOS update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/</link>
	<description>Set The World On Fire!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/#comment-657170</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=5320#comment-657170</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;sweeeeet. mine is on the list!! M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 AMD 890GX
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sweeeeet. mine is on the list!! M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 AMD 890GX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boov</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/#comment-657169</link>
		<dc:creator>Boov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=5320#comment-657169</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My board is listed there :)&lt;br /&gt;
But I find this slightly strange? Will there be any disadvantages? And why is is only Asus boards that will work?&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking of buying sandy bridge, but this has made me have second thoughts
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My board is listed there <img src='http://razetheworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
But I find this slightly strange? Will there be any disadvantages? And why is is only Asus boards that will work?<br />
I was thinking of buying sandy bridge, but this has made me have second thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabu Rabu</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/#comment-657168</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabu Rabu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=5320#comment-657168</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hm, wonder if the chip would take any kind of performance decrease from this kind of thing, I assumed there would be more to AM3+ boards that couldn&#039;t just be added with a bios flash.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, wonder if the chip would take any kind of performance decrease from this kind of thing, I assumed there would be more to AM3+ boards that couldn&#8217;t just be added with a bios flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: razerboi</title>
		<link>http://razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/#comment-657167</link>
		<dc:creator>razerboi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://razetheworld.com/?p=5320#comment-657167</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thats nice of AMD to do that
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats nice of AMD to do that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  razetheworld.com/hardware/asus-current-motherboard-supported-the-bulldozer-with-bios-update/feed/ ) in 0.50544 seconds, on May 19th, 2012 at 1:58 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2012 at 2:58 am UTC -->
